Lock step no more: Iran war shows cracks in Trump's conservative media support

NEW YORK (AP) — For President Donald Trump, some of the sharpest criticism he's faced in the early days of theIran warhas come from once-loyal media figures far more accustomed to singing his praises.

Associated Press FILE - President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office at the White House, Tuesday, March 3, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File) FILE - Megyn Kelly speaks at a campaign rally with Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump at PPG Paints Arena, Nov. 4, 2024, in Pittsburgh, Pa. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) FILE - Tucker Carlson attends a meeting with President Donald Trump and oil executives in the East Room of the White House, Friday, Jan. 9, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is reflected in a video camera lens as she speaks during a briefing in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Nathan Howard) President Donald Trump, accompanied by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaks to reporters before departing on Marine One from the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

US Iran MAGA Media

Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Matt Walsh are among those to express discontent. It's been noticed in the White House, which has been playing defense on social media and in interviews.

To be sure, these critics are the minority of the media MAGAsphere, where Fox News' biggest stars remain cheerleaders. But their words illustrate conservative media's influence and how valuable it is to Trump when all runs as a well-oiled machine — and, by contrast, how much of a problem it can be if it fractures.

Much of the criticism has centered on Israel's influence on Trump's decision to go to war. Carlson, theformer Fox News starwho has built his own independent operation, told ABC News over the weekend that the attack was "absolutely disgusting and evil."

"It's hard to say this, but the United States didn't make the decision here," Carlson said on his podcast, citing the Israeli prime minister. "Benjamin Netanyahu did."

'No one should have to die for a foreign country'

Kelly, anotherformer Fox anchor gone indie, said about American casualties on her show that "no one should have to die for a foreign country. I don't think those service members died for the United States. I think they died for Iran or Israel."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio's remarks prior to aCapitol Hill briefingwere a flashpoint. Rubio said that Trump had given the go-ahead for the operation knowing that Israel was prepared to strike and he feared retaliation from Iran against U.S. bases in the region.

"We knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them, before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties," Rubio said. House Speaker Mike Johnson said that if the administration had not acted, lawmakers would have wondered why.

Walsh, a Daily Wire host, wrote on X that Rubio was "flat out telling us that we're in a war with Iran because Israel forced our hand. This is basically the worst possible thing he could have said."

Trump told journalist Rachael Bade in an interview that he did not believe that the opinions of Carlson and Kelly are shared by his base of supporters. "I think that MAGA is Trump," he said. "MAGA's not the other two."

Former U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has fashioned herself as an influencer and media figure sincebitterly breakingwith Trump, said on Kelly's podcast that she was furious over the U.S. military action. "Make America Great Again," Greene says, "was supposed to be America first, not Israel first."

Will Trump supporters return to the fold?

Trump is probably right to think that most of his supporters will return to the fold if they're unhappy with the Iran attack, said Jason Zengerle, author of "Hated By All the Right People: Tucker Carlson and the Unraveling of the Conservative Mind." Given the consistency of his views on the topic, Carlson is probably the most important of Trump's conservative critics, Zengerle said.

Advertisement

"If the war does go badly, I think it strengthens the hand of someone like Tucker," he said. "All of this is a debate about what happens after Trump is gone anyway."

There have been cracks in Trump's conservative media support prior to Iran, notably with the vast and sprawling narratives around the Epstein report. But this week's criticism unleashed some startling internal vitriol. Ben Shapiro of "The Daily Wire" called Kelly "wildly inconsistent" and a coward. Elisabeth Hasselbeck denounced Kelly for her suggestion that American servicemen died for Israel. "How dare you?" Hasselbeck said Tuesday on "The View."

Fox News' Sean Hannity said that Carlson was "not the person I knew when he was at Fox." Kelly denounced Hannity as a supplicant who "would never say anything other than to puff Donald Trump up."

It's worth remembering that most of what readers and viewers are seeing in conservative media supports Trump. Howard Polskin, publisher of The Righting newsletter, estimated Tuesday that about 95% of what he's monitored on websites is behind the president. "Trump Stands Tall on Iran," headlined The American Spectator.

The most popular personalities on Fox News — still the top dog among conservatives — continue to be supportive. Hannity, Brian Kilmeade and Mark Levin were among the most vociferous leading up to the attack and after. "The president has shown more courage and this Pentagon, Pete Hegseth's Pentagon, has executed brilliantly once again," said Kilmeade, the "Fox & Friends" co-host.

"I think that MAGA gives him the benefit of the doubt, no question about it," Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary during the early part of Trump's first term, said on his podcast Tuesday. "I think he's built up a ton of credibility with the base. ... Look, you've got PTSD from a lot of our former leaders between Iraq and Afghanistan in particular, who only know forever wars, and so I get it. But this president has proven now twice that he knows what he's doing."

Criticism of war rollout draws specific White House rebuke

Thepodcast influencerswho helped to drive many young men into Trump's camp during the 2024 campaign have been largely quiet so far.

Some of Walsh's criticism this week appeared to sting so much that it drew a specific rebuke from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

"So far we've heard that although we killed the whole Iranian regime, this was not a regime change war," Walsh wrote on Monday. "And although we obliterated their nuclear program, we had to do this because of their nuclear program. And although Iran was not planning any attacks on the U.S., they also might have been, depending on who you ask. And although we are not fighting this war to free the Iranian people, they are now free, or might be, depending on who seizes power, and we have no idea who that will be. The messaging on this thing is, to put it mildly, confused."

Leavitt posted a lengthy response on X explaining Trump's rationale. "Simply put," she wrote, "the terrorist Iranian regime would not say yes to peace."

Bauder and Swenson reported from New York, Kinnard from Washington.

Lock step no more: Iran war shows cracks in Trump's conservative media support

NEW YORK (AP) — For President Donald Trump, some of the sharpest criticism he's faced in the early days of theIran w...
'Yellowstone' Fans Are Really Bummed Out About 'Marshals'

The cavalry of theYellowstonefranchisehas arrived on horseback in the form of spin-off/sequel seriesMarshalson CBS. Being the fourth television series set in continuity but the first tocontinue the storyfrom the flagship series byTaylor Sheridan,Marshalshas a lot to live up to for its legion of fans. Unfortunately, most are disappointed by the results.

Esquire

On March 1,Marshalspremiered on CBS and streaming on Paramount+. The show sees several familiar faces fromYellowstone, includingLuke Grimes, back inside Sheridan's Montana-sized sandbox. Set after the events of the original show, former Navy SEAL and rancherKayce Dutton(Grimes) takes up a new gig as a specialized US Marshal patrolling the Treasure State.

As of right now, viewership ratings aren't in for the series. But critical reception is lukewarm. OnRotten Tomatoes, the consensus of professional critics lands at 50 percent. The audience consensus is even worse, with a 47 percent "Popcornmeter," meaning that even everyday users of Rotten Tomatoes are unenthused by the new series. How did Esquire's resident Sheridan expert, Josh Rosenberg, feel aboutMarshals?Well, he didn't hold back.

On Reddit and X (née Twitter), fans are split over the series. While someYellowstonefaithful are pleased and promise to tune in for more, others are comparingMarshalsunfavorably withYellowstone. On Reddit's r/YellowstonePN,a thread inviting the subredditto express "first thoughts onMarshals"has comments ranging from disappointment that the show feels like a generic network procedural to outright hatred for the series.

"It was about what I expected for network. It's just formula fiction, like NCIS or CSI but with a Dutton. I'll watch, but I won't feel good about it," wroteu/shannonH73.

"About what I expected. Just another cbs procedural with Yellowstone tacked on to make sure it gets watched. It wasn't awful but certainly wasn't good," wroteu/dwts16.

"Basically SWAT: Montana with a couple characters from Yellowstone. E1 seemed like an episode of the week," saidu/Just_Another_Day_926.

Advertisement

Some commenters thought the show was actually "pretty good," such asu/Realistic-Lake5897. Under their post, contrarians likeu/Prnce_Chrminsaid, "I was only a few minutes in and it felt poorly written with (some) cringe and predictable dialogues, and often filmed in a green room not at real locations, and just sloppy and lazy and very small budget."

In a different threadon r/YellowstonePN, a sarcastic viewer called the show "NCIS: Yellowstone" and said they'll "go back to waiting on the next season ofLandman." The comments are full of similar feelings, althoughu/ViperFive1said that they got what they expected.

"It's been know for a year that this was going to be a network procedural based Yellowstone universe and not simply more Yellowstone. Tonight was fine unless you were expecting something other than exactly what they were telling us it was going to be," they wrote.

"The minute it became a Network show, the dye was cast and it was gonna be a cookie cutter bland show to appease the FCC," saidu/AlexTorres96.

"It was horrible," saidu/Amarylliswpg.

On Musk's Twitter, fans are even saltier overMarshals.

Still, the adage that "you can't please everyone" rings true in the other way. SomeYellowstonefaithful haven't lost hope, and they promise to come back for more.

You Might Also Like

‘Yellowstone’ Fans Are Really Bummed Out About ‘Marshals’

The cavalry of theYellowstonefranchisehas arrived on horseback in the form of spin-off/sequel seriesMarshalson CBS. Bein...
Justin Timberlake sues to stop the release of arrest video

Singer Justin Timberlake, through his attorneys, filed a petition on Monday to stop the release of video footage capturing his 2024 arrest.

Good Morning America

The petition, filed against Sag Harbor Village Police Department, the chief of police and the city of Sag Harbor, claims that the "intention to disseminate body-worn camera footage from Petitioner's traffic stop and arrest on June 18, 2024 constitutes an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy under Public Officers Law."

In the court filing, obtained by ABC News, Timberlake's attorney asks the court to "permanently enjoin" the footage from being released in response to a request for it under the Freedom of Information Law.

Justin Timberlake reveals Lyme disease diagnosis

Timberlake wasarrested in June2024 after police alleged Timberlake was driving while intoxicated. The singer pleaded not guilty to charges stemming from the arrest, before reaching aplea deal to resolve the casein September 2024. He pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of driving while impaired. He was ordered to pay a fine and perform community service.

Ted Shaffrey/AP,Files - PHOTO: Justin Timberlake urges drivers not to get behind the wheel after even a single alcoholic drink in Sag Harbor, New York, Sept. 13, 2024, as part of his sentence for driving while impaired.

The petition went on to claim that the video shows Timberlake in "an acutely vulnerable state."

"Public dissemination of this footage would cause severe and irreparable harm to Petitioner's personal and professional reputation, subject Petitioner to public ridicule and harassment, and serve no legitimate public interest in understanding the operations of government," the petition said.

According to the petition, the full video shows eight hours "of continuous recording and encroaches upon areas of Petitioner's life and emotional state that have no relevance at all to Petitioner's arrest."

Advertisement

Furthermore, the filing argues that releasing the footage would "constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy because it reveals intimate, highly personal, and sensitive details concerning [Timberlake] and his family, and includes information of medical, familial, otherwise confidential nature."

Timberlake was leaving the American Hotel in June 2024 when he was stopped for allegedly running a stop sign and swerving into the oncoming lane. The officer smelled booze on his breath, according to a police report.

In a criminal complaint, police noted that Timberlake had bloodshot, glassy eyes. He also had slow speech, was unsteady on his feet and performed poorly on a field sobriety test, according to the complaint.

Justin Timberlake pleads not guilty for 2nd time to charges stemming from DWI arrest

Hepleaded not guiltytwice to charges stemming from his arrest for driving while intoxicated. Following his first not-guilty plea, he had a re-arraignment on Aug. 2, where the singer appeared virtually, after a paperwork error when he was initially charged.

After his arrest, Timberlake addressed what he was going through during a performance at Chicago's United Center in June 2024.

"We've been through ups and downs and lefts and rights," he said.

"It's been a tough week," he continued. "But you're here, and I'm here."

ABC News has reached out to the Sag Harbor Police chief, a lawyer for the village and a representative for Timberlake for comment.

Justin Timberlake sues to stop the release of arrest video

Singer Justin Timberlake, through his attorneys, filed a petition on Monday to stop the release of video footage capturi...
Tyler Perry Denies Sexual Assault Allegations, Calls $77 Million Lawsuit a 'Money Grab'

Tyler Perry denied "each and every allegation" in a newly filed court response to a sexual assault lawsuit from Mario Rodriguez and argued the claims are legally deficient

People Tyler Perry and Mario RodriguezCredit: Prince Williams/FilmMagic;Rob Latour/Variety/Penske Media/Getty

NEED TO KNOW

  • Perry's legal team described the lawsuit as a fabricated attempt to extract money after he allegedly stopped providing Rodriguez financial assistance, while Rodriguez is seeking $77 million in damages

  • Rodriguez, who had a minor role in Boo! A Madea Halloween, alleges Perry made unwanted sexual advances and assaulted him — claims Perry denies as he seeks to move the case to federal court

Tyler Perryis denying sexual assault allegations in a newly filed court response, calling a $77 million lawsuit against him a "money grab."

In an answer filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on Feb. 27, Perry denied "each and every allegation" made by Mario Rodriguez and laid out 19 affirmative defenses.

The 56-year-old's attorneys argue the complaint fails to state valid legal claims, that Rodriguez did not suffer damages and that any alleged contact was consensual.

The response goes further, describing the lawsuit as a fabricated attempt to extract money after Perry allegedly stopped providing Rodriguez with financial assistance.

Tyler Perry and Mario RodriguezCredit: Randy Shropshire/Getty; John Parra/WireImage

According to the filing, Rodriguez had a "very minor role" in one Perry film about a decade ago and later repeatedly asked for help covering expenses such as housing, medical services and unpaid bills.

Perry is also seeking to move the case to federal court. The filing states that he and Lionsgate intend to remove the action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Advertisement

Rodriguez's initial lawsuit, obtained by PEOPLE, paints a very different picture. He alleges that Perry sexually assaulted him and made unwanted advances while promising acting opportunities. Rodriguez appeared as "Frat Guy #10" in Perry's 2016 filmBoo! A Madea Halloween.

In the complaint, Rodriguez claims Perry invited him to his home under the guise of discussing work and, during one alleged incident in 2018, grabbed him despite repeated requests to stop.

He further alleges Perry told him, "If you were to just be with me, I would take care of you," and says that after two incidents Perry apologized and gave him $5,000. Rodriguez is seeking $77 million in damages.

Perry has denied the allegations. His attorney, Alex Spiro, said in a Dec. 26 statement that the claims are "another demand from more than a decade ago which will also be a failed money grab."

Rodriguez is represented by Jonathan J. Delshad, who also represents Derek Dixon in a separate lawsuit against Perry. Dixon, who starred in Perry's seriesThe Oval, filed a $260 million lawsuit in June alleging sexual harassment, assault and retaliation, which Perry denies. Delshad has said Dixon's claims "are alive and well" after being moved from California to Georgia.

PEOPLE has reached out to representatives for both parties for additional comment.

Read the original article onPeople

Tyler Perry Denies Sexual Assault Allegations, Calls $77 Million Lawsuit a ‘Money Grab’

Tyler Perry denied "each and every allegation" in a newly filed court response to a sexual assault lawsuit fro...
Christina Applegate Reveals Who She Ditched Brad Pitt for After Bringing Him as Her Date to the 1989 MTV VMAs

Christina Applegate reveals which rock star she left the 1989 MTV VMAs with despite bringing Brad Pitt as her date

People Brad Pitt and Christina Applegate at the 1989 MTV Video Music AwardsCredit: Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic

NEED TO KNOW

  • She previously was asked about the rumor on Watch What Happens Live in 2015 but wouldn't name the mystery man

  • In her new memoir, Applegate says Pitt was "very mad at me" afterward

Christina Applegateis reflecting on the time she leftBrad Pittin the lurch after bringing him as her date to an awards show.

In her new memoirYou With the Sad Eyes, out now, theDead to Meactress, 54, at one point recalls inviting Pitt to the 1989 MTV Video Music Awards in Los Angeles after they'd already been "platonic pals for the longest time."

Applegate, who was 17 at the time and at the peak of herMarried... with Childrensitcom fame, wore a classy Ceil Chapman gown to the ceremony that made her feel so "incredible."

"In fact," she adds in the book, "I felt so powerful and sure of myself for once that when the awards show was over, I left withSebastian Bach, not Brad Pitt."

The actress said she had been eyeing Skid Row frontman Bach, now 57, the whole night. She pointed out that Pitt, now 62, was "still making his way as an actor, and he wasn't yet THE Brad Pitt, the man of so many people's dreams." (The eventual Oscar winner's big break would come with a memorable role in 1991'sThelma & Louise.)

https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cufid

Christina Applegate; Brad PittCredit: Jon Kopaloff/Getty; Stephane Cardinale - Corbis/Corbis via Getty

Applegate, who is nowmarried to musician Martyn LeNoble, 56, writes that Pitt "was left to sullenly drive" her mom and a friend home from the event after ditching him for the rock star.

Advertisement

"Not surprisingly, [he] was subsequently very mad at me. We didn't talk for many years after that," writes Applegate, adding, "Eventually, we agreed that I'd been a kid, and though he'd deserved much better, it was time to forgive the child who dumped him for the lead singer of Skid Row."

Sebastian Bach at the 1989 MTV Video Music AwardsCredit: Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic

While onWatch What Happens Live with Andy Cohenback in 2015, Applegateplayed "Plead the Fifth" andwas asked about the rumor that she ditched Pitt at the award show.

Cohen asked Applegate who the other man was that she left Pitt for that night, to which she responded coyly, "How many fifths do I get? ... I have to say it? I don't have to do nothin'!" She confirmed the mystery man was famous but not an actor and that they didn't go on to date after that night. She also said she did not date Pitt after that.

Applegate's new bookYou With the Sad Eyesspans her childhood, past abusive relationships, motherhood, and her experiences with both breast cancer and MS.

"We all have come from somewhere, some places more painful than others, and it's what you do with it, I guess," she told PEOPLE in a recent cover story. "This is not an inspirational book by any means. But it can inspire."

You With the Sad Eyesis out now wherever books are sold.

Read the original article onPeople

Christina Applegate Reveals Who She Ditched Brad Pitt for After Bringing Him as Her Date to the 1989 MTV VMAs

Christina Applegate reveals which rock star she left the 1989 MTV VMAs with despite bringing Brad Pitt as her date ...
An Oscar race that looked like a runaway may be a close call, after all

NEW YORK (AP) — Who says to beware the Ides of March?

Associated Press

A March 15Academy Awardsmay feel late. By then, it will be almost a year since"Sinners"sunk its teeth into moviegoers last April. Some nominees have been on the campaign trail since theCannes Film Festivalin May.

But the upside of a prolongedOscarrace has meant some unexpected late drama. Think about the same movies long enough, and minds can change. For months, Paul Thomas Anderson's"One Battle After Another"sailed through awards season, picking up prize after prize. But the wins for "Sinners" and Michael B. Jordan atSunday's Actor Awards— along with some other recent developments — have given the Oscar race what Smoke or Stack might call fresh blood.

An Academy Awards that had looked like a runaway might be a close call, after all. With Oscar voting ending Thursday, let's survey the top categories

Best Picture

WHERE THINGS STAND

"One Battle After Another" has won at theGolden Globes, theBAFTAs, theProducers Guildand theDirectors Guild. But its nearly unblemished record was shaken up at Sunday's Actor Awards (formerly the SAG Awards), where "Sinners" took the top prize. You'd have to have quite a few rounds at the "Sinners" juke joint to convince yourself that anything else has much of a chance.

WHAT HAS THE EDGE

The tea leaves are strongest for Anderson's "One Battle After Another." The Producers Guild, which uses a preferential ballot like the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences does, is among the most predictive of bellwethers. Their winners have matched the last five years and in eight of the last 10 years.

The actors guild best ensemble prize, on the other hand, has a shaky track record. In the last 31 years, the SAG winner has matched the Oscar champ only 15 times. The win for "Sinners," though, came right in the midst of Oscar voting. It was a good time to show out. So this race feels close to a coin flip, with a Warner Bros. movie on both sides. The awards season resume makes "One Battle After Another" the front-runner. But "Sinners," even witha record-setting 16 Oscar nominations, gets to play the underdog.

Best Actor

WHERE THINGS STAND

This has been one of the most competitive and hard-to-call races of the season. Look at Leonardo DiCaprio. He gives one of the best performances of his career, in the best picture favorite, and he's still a long shot. Instead,Timothée Chalametwas widely perceived as in the lead after early wins at the Globes and the Critics Choice Awards for his frenetic performance in "Marty Supreme." But the BAFTAs muddied the waters (Robert Aramayo, not in the Oscar mix, was the unexpected winner). And "Sinners" star Michael B. Jordan, much to his surprise, won at the Actor Awards.

WHO HAS THE EDGE

Advertisement

Chalamet's maybe meta campaign, full of swagger and braggadocio, rubbed some voters the wrong way. At the same time, many in the academy felt the 30-year-old should have won last year, for his Bob Dylan in "A Complete Unknown" — a year when he won with the actors guild but lost toAdrien Brody ("The Brutalist")at the Oscars. Chalamet will hope the reverse happens this year. But the academy is notoriously resistant to rewarding young stars. Jordan, 39, isn't much older. But it now suddenly feels like his moment.

Best Actress

WHERE THINGS STAND

Since the fall festival launch of "Hamnet,"Jessie Buckleyhas been the favorite. She's won at the Globes, the BAFTAs and the Actor Awards. Her closest competition is probably Rose Byrne, who won at the Globes in the comedy/musical category for "If I Had Legs I'd Kick You."

WHO HAS THE EDGE

This one's easy. Fortunes have fluctuated in most of the top categories, but Buckley has been entrenched as the front-runner for months.

Best Supporting Actor

WHERE THINGS STAND

Sean Penn, a two-time Oscar winner, has done nearly no campaigning, yet he finds himself the favorite after winning at the Actor Awards and the BAFTAs. But several other nominees remain in the mix.Stellan Skarsgård("Sentimental Value") won at the Globes and is the kind of widely-liked veteran actor the academy likes to reward. But so is Delroy Lindo ("Sinners"), who was a surprise Oscar nominee. In the eyes of many, Lindo has quickly joined the contenders.

WHO HAS THE EDGE

Penn's recent wins put him clearly in the lead, and he might stay there. But this remains a category rife with possibilities. The academy's strong international leanings should help Skarsgård. And it wasn't an accident that when "Sinners" won best ensemble at the Actor Awards, Lindo gave the acceptance speech.

Best Supporting Actress

WHERE THINGS STAND

This category has been all over the map. Teyana Taylor ("One Battle After Another") won at the Globes. Wunmi Mosaku ("Sinners") won at the BAFTAs. And Amy Madigan ("Weapons") won at both the Actor Awards and the Critics Choice Awards.

WHO HAS THE EDGE

Any of those three could win. Two of them — Taylor and Mosaku — have the benefit of co-starring in films the academy obviously loves. "Sinners" and "One Battle After Another" have 29 nominations between them, while "Weapons" has only the one. Yet the 75-year-old Madigan, another celebrated character actor who's been great for decades, has the momentum thanks to her charming Actors Award speech.

An Oscar race that looked like a runaway may be a close call, after all

NEW YORK (AP) — Who says to beware the Ides of March? A March 15Academy Awardsmay feel late. By then, it wil...
Kesha says White House using her song is 'disgusting and inhumane'

Keshais criticizingPresident Donald Trump'sadministration after the White House used one of her songs without permission on TikTok.

USA TODAY

"It's come to my attention that The White House has used one of my songs on TikTok to incite violence and threaten war. Trying to make light of war is disgusting and inhumane. I absolutely do NOT approve of my music being used to promote violence of any kind," Keshawrote on social mediaon March 2.

"Love always trumps hate. please love yourself and each other in times like this," she continued. "This show of blatant disregard for human life and quite frankly this attack on all of our nervous systems is the opposite of what I stand for."

The singer also referenced mentions ofTrump in the Department of Justice's files on Jeffrey Epstein, writing, "Also, don't let this distract us from the fact that criminal predatorDonald Trumpappears in the Files over a million times."

On Feb. 10, the White House's TikTok account posted avideocompilation of military fighter jets to Kesha's 2010 song, "Blow" with the caption, "Lethality."

<p style=Trump's second term saw aggressive immigration and trade moves, federal downsizing, and assertive foreign interventions in Venezuela and Iran. President Donald Trump has doubled down on an aggressive immigration agenda, emphasizing record-low levels of illegal border crossings and a sweeping expansion of enforcement. In his February 2026 State of the Union address, Trump highlighted a nine‑month period in which, he claimed, "zero illegal aliens" were admitted into the U.S.—a statement that fact-checkers noted conflated admission with release on parole, though data does show no parole releases during that period.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=The administration has also promoted major enforcement gains: significant declines in illegal crossings, a dramatic reduction in interior releases, expanded deportation operations, and tightened border controls, according to a February 2026 White House summary of its immigration actions. More broadly, the administration continues implementing executive actions that restrict entry at the southern border and increase immigration enforcement nationwide, including policies tied to TrumpÕs 2025 proclamation invoking federal authority to suspend certain entries. [whitehouse.gov]

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=President Donald Trump has intensified his tariff‑driven economic strategy in his second term, expanding duties across global partners while positioning tariffs as a central tool to bolster U.S. industry. Despite broad tariff hikes, the U.S. trade deficit surged in late 2025, reaching a record goods shortfall even as the administration sought to curb imports and revive domestic manufacturing—a goal undercut by a decline in factory employment during the same period.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=President Donald Trump has undertaken an unprecedented downsizing and restructuring of the federal government during his second term, marked by aggressive workforce reductions, major agency overhauls, and expanded executive authority over civil service rules.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=Federal workforce cuts accelerated sharply in 2025, with estimates showing reductions ranging from 220,000 to more than 300,000 employees through voluntary departure incentives, pressure campaigns, buyouts, and targeted firingsÑresulting in the smallest federal workforce share recorded since the 1930s.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was created at the start of President Trump's second term to drive sweeping federal workforce reductions. DOGE spearheaded mass buyouts, layoffs, and restructuring across agencies, including the rollout of the Deferred Resignation Program and guidance encouraging the firing of probationary employees. Its initiatives contributed to a net loss of more than 150,000 federal workers early in Trump's second term, with broader governmentwide workforce reductions continuing into 2026.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=Elon Musk was appointed to lead DOGE and initially served as the public face of Trump's government‑shrinkage agenda. However, his influence declined significantly after he stepped away from the department and entered a public feud with President Trump. Many DOGE staffers left government during this period, and DOGE became associated with controversial actions including the dismantling of USAID and alleged improper access to agency data. Musk originally claimed DOGE would identify $2 trillion in government savings, but the department's website later estimated only $215 billion, a figure analysts say was overstated.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill", signed July 4, 2025, reshaped federal tax law by extending lower individual tax rates from the 2017 TCJA, increasing standard deductions, and adding new temporary deductions for tips and overtime.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=The law also phases out clean‑energy incentives and cuts programs like Medicaid and SNAP, with the Congressional Budget Office projecting a $4.1 trillion increase in deficits over 10 years due to the package.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=President Trump has aligned many social policies with the goals of Project 2025, targeting reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ protections, DEI programs, and gender‑affirming care. His administration has signed executive orders eliminating transgender protections, removing DEI offices across federal agencies, and directing schools to deny funding if they allow transgender girls to compete in girls' sports. He has also pursued efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and restrict reproductive‑health access—though not all proposed measures have succeeded.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=Trump has moved aggressively to remake federal cultural institutions, ordering the removal of what he calls "anti‑American ideology" from museums, national parks, and research centers. Actions include restoring Confederate statues, removing slavery‑related exhibits and Native‑American history signage from national parks, and pressuring institutions like the Smithsonian and Kennedy Center while installing political allies onto boards. Civil‑rights groups warn these moves risk erasing critical historical truths and reversing decades of social progress

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=During his second term, President Donald Trump has systematically dismantled diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across the federal government. Executive orders have eliminated DEI offices and policies, with agencies placing all DEI‑related staff on administrative leave and shutting down DEI programs entirely. His administration also removed DEI departments at major cultural institutions such as the Smithsonian and National Gallery of Art in early 2025. Trump has framed DEI initiatives as "anti‑American ideology," directing agencies and cultural institutions to strip references to DEI, sexual orientation and gender identity from rules, grants, and regulations. These moves reflect a broader cultural agenda aimed at reversing equity‑focused policies across education, federal agencies, and the arts sector.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=On January 3, 2026, President Donald Trump ordered a large‑scale U.S. military operation in Venezuela—Operation Absolute Resolve—resulting in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. U.S. forces conducted coordinated strikes across northern Venezuela to suppress air defenses before extracting the pair, who were flown to New York to face narco‑terrorism–related charges. The Trump administration framed the action as a law‑enforcement mission with military support, asserting inherent presidential authority, while Venezuela and several regional governments condemned it as a violation of sovereignty.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" /> <p style=In late February and early March 2026, President Donald Trump announced that the United States had begun "major combat operations in Iran," launching strikes alongside Israel targeting Iranian leadership, military infrastructure, and missile capabilities. The joint assault targeted high‑level officials, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian, and was framed by Trump as necessary to eliminate "imminent threats" and prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

" style="max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:6px; margin:10px 0;" loading="lazy" />

Trump second term marked by turbulent moves. See photos

Trump's second term saw aggressive immigration and trade moves, federal downsizing, and assertive foreign interventions in Venezuelaand Iran. President Donald Trump has doubled down on an aggressiveimmigrationagenda, emphasizing record-low levels of illegal border crossings and a sweeping expansion of enforcement. In his February 2026 State of the Union address, Trump highlighted a nine‑month period in which, he claimed, "zero illegal aliens" were admitted into the U.S.—a statement that fact-checkers noted conflated admission with release on parole, though data does show no parole releases during that period.

More news:Justin Timberlake sues to keep video of DWI arrest private

White House responds to Kesha after criticism over use of her song

Kesha poses at the red carpet during the 68th Annual Grammy Awards in Los Angeles, California, on Feb. 1, 2026.

In response to Kesha's post, White House Communications Director Steven Cheungwrote on X,"All these 'singers' keep falling for this. This just gives us more attention and more view counts to our videos because people want to see what they're bitching about. Thank you for your attention to this matter."

Kaelan Dorr, another member of the White House's communications team, alsowrote on X: "Kesha quotes are like Popeye's Spinach to this team Memes? They'll continue. Winning? Will also continue."

Advertisement

When contacted by USA TODAY for comment, the White House referred to Cheung and Dorr's posts.

After the pair of responses from the White House, Kesha madeanother post on X, writing, "Stop using my music, perverts @WhiteHouse."

Kesha is the latest to disapprove of Trump administration's music use

Kesha joins a growing list of singers who have condemned the Trump administration for using their music on social media.

In December 2025, theWhite House deleted a videofeaturingSabrina Carpenter'ssong "Juno" after shecalled the post "evil and disgusting."

"Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda," Carpenter wrote on X on Dec. 2. The White House's post showed individuals being detained byImmigration and Customs Enforcementwhile the pop star's song played.

Similarly, in November 2025, after theDepartment of Homeland Security used Olivia Rodrigo's song"all-american bitch" on a post promoting deportations, the singer commented, "Don't ever use my songs to promote your racist, hateful propaganda."

Others who have spoken out against the Trump administration for using their music includeSemisonic,Isaac Hayes,Jess Glynneand evenPokémon.

Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached atmelina.khan@usatoday.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Kesha slams White House for using her song on TikTok

Kesha says White House using her song is 'disgusting and inhumane'

Keshais criticizingPresident Donald Trump'sadministration after the White House used one of her songs without permis...

 

JIT MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com